Come Bandit
It's time for our walk.
Our daily quest for questions,
You with your nose, I with my eye.
FRED'S SCRIBBLES
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Saturday, July 6, 2013
CUTSHALL EULOGY
EULOGY
FOR CUTSHALL
Dear Carol Anne:
Your Dad
was my friend. I don’t use the term friend lightly. In my 70 plus years I count
the people I call friend on one hand. I have always been attracted to people
who were hedonistic enough to be fun, intelligent enough to be interesting, altruistic
enough to be trusted. Your Dad more than adequately met all these
criteria. Even though we were separated
by physical distance, we maintained a friendship for over 50 years
My first
encounter with your Dad was in the Army, stationed in Germany. They were good times. We were young; had no responsibilities except
our military duty, and found ourselves in a new and exciting environment. We didn’t take the military to seriously, but
took our work as important and stimulating.
Our unit was a diverse cast of characters, most with 3 digit I.Q’s. Your Dad was among them, although he liked to
hide his mentality behind a “Good Old boy/Cowboy” persona.
Unlike
many GI’s, your Dad and I took advantage of our all expense paid sabbatical in
Europe. Your Dad taught himself a fair
command of the German language. I am
relatively passive in nature therefore with your Dad’s outgoing nature we
formed a formidable partnership. As
comrades-in-arms we had many adventures.
A few he wouldn’t want his offspring to know about (or mine for that
matter). We saw a good deal of Europe
from our motorcycles. We put on our
cowboy boots and went to the Opera and Ballet.
We spent many a night around a gasthaus table talking philosophy,
literature, nature and telling assorted lies about our past. I regret not setting down with your Dad and
recording these memories. But in the end
all we have left is our memories.
Our
friendship at this time resulted in two major influences in our lives. First, Your Dad arranged the initial date
with my wife of over 50 years. We all
worked in the same office; Jack, Marianne and myself. Jack and Marianne were on the committee to
arrange the office Christmas party. Your
Dad suggested I escort Marianne to the party. The rest as they say “is
history”. Second, I believe I was a
major influence in convincing your Dad to return to University and get his
degree in Range Management. He went on
in this field to distinguish himself as an authority in marshland ecology and
president of the Louisiana State Cattleman’s Association.
After
the military we went our separate ways. Even though distance, work, family,
culture, politics separated us, we kept in touch over the years. There were Christmas letters (which your Dad
never answered), evening long phone calls and occasional visits. The parting words were always “Keep in touch”
and we did over many years.
I have
only good memories of your Dad. You probably have some bad memories related to
his alcoholism. I am possibly one of the few people to know of the depth of his
addiction. I also have great admiration for his courage, character, and
tenacity to control this curse.
It was privilege to have your father as my
friend.
Sincerely: Fred
Winkler
EULOGY FOR BILL
Eulogy for Bill
My brother and I lived in different
worlds. Separated by distance and culture. I did not know him very well. I didn’t know what books he read, if any;
what music he liked, or even if he liked music; or his political views. What I do know is that he was a decent
man. I define decency as doing no harm
and making a contribution to society.
Doing no harm is a baseline. Bill went in a positive direction from this
baseline by always being helpful to the people he came in contact with. His major contribution to society was his
day-to-day gift of bringing joy and good will to all who passed his way. He gave the gift of guidance to his children
that they became decent people in his
image. He was a loving son, husband, father, son-in-law. (I’m having trouble
using the past tense.)
Childhood
memories have faded over the years to mere wisps: Long summer evenings playing
hide and seek under the street light on the corner, the “secret Passage” behind
the neighborhood garages, the adventures in the woods behind the school. We had
our usual sibling squabbles and territorial disputes but we managed to get
through it without killing each other.
In
adolescence we began to develop our own interests. Bill developing his people
skills, Jack his athletic skills, and me and my books. My recollection of high school years is that
the three of us were pretty much doing our own things.
After I
went away to school I have fond memories of the summers at home. Most every weekend we would triple date: Bill
and Sandy, Jack and Barb, Donna and I. I
always got stuck driving the “Old Chief ”.
However I always had the rearview mirror adjusted so I could keep track
of what was going on in the backseat. On
special occasions we would go dancing at Moonlight Gardens at Coney Island or
the Pavilion at Ault Park. Then there were the drive-in movies. I’d best leave
that alone. We would generally end up at
the Sky Galley at Lunkin (Spelling?) Airport.
Many times we were asked to leave by the guy with the mop bucket.
Bill visited my world a few times,
mostly with his family. However there were two special occasions when there
were just the two of us. The summer
following my graduation from college I took a job in northern California. After much fussing over the car and our gear
by our Dad, Bill and I took off camping across the continent. After many adventures, the last night found
us camped at a beautiful cirque lake high in the Humbolt Mountains of Nevada. When Bill talked of that night his
remembrance were that of the mice running over his sleeping bag all night. The next day we dropped down into Reno. Bill
flew home and I continued on to Susanville, California. The Second special trip
was more recent, to southern Utah. We
spent a week on a houseboat on Lake Powell with my lunatic fire fighting
comrades. Good Booze, Good Food, Good
Company, Fair Fishing.
I had always hoped for one more
road trip. Perhaps with our sons.
Perhaps to Sante Fe, Frioli Canyon, the Kiva at Aztec, Mesa Verdi, maybe
even Chaco Canyon. But alas, time ran
out. Sleep in peace, my brother,
perchance to dream.
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
REFLECTIONS ON 73 YEARS
Today was my 73rd Birthday. So far so good. It's been a pretty good run. I've had the love of 3, maybe 4, women. I've managed, I hope, to maintain the love of my children and so far I haven't had to bury any of them. At least three times I have been a part of a group of men with common goals, competency, and absolute trust. I've experienced quite a few of the envoirments of this world. I continue to learn more about the past, present and future of the Universe. I think I'll stick around a little longer.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
from society oferican Foresters
FRED J. WINKLER
SAF Member 30 + years
624 IRISH DR
Fort Collins, CO
80521
United States
RE: JF-10-103 Version 1
CATHARSIS OF AN OLD FORESTER
Dear FRED J. WINKLER,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript titled "CATHARSIS OF AN OLD FORESTER," (see Blog posting blow)
manuscript JF-10-103 Version 1, for review by the Journal of Forestry. Based on the
reviews, I regret to inform you that we will not be able to accept this manuscript for
publication in the journal.
Frankly, I am not sure where you're going with this commentary. Who is the villain? The
corporation? The environmentalists? The public foresters swayed by appeals? All of us?
There is more than enough blame to go around, as far as I can tell, but what is the
lesson here? Saying we acted unsustainably is a fair accusation, but even now the
definition of sustainability is not agreed upon by all segments of our nation, each of
whom expects equal, if not primary, say in how our resources are managed. I can only
imagine the frustration of someone who has spent his life caring for our natural
resources seeing the current state of affairs. A successful commentary in the Journal of
Forestry must do more than vent frustration รข€“ it must clearly articulate the perceived
problem, and outline a suggestion for a solution.
Thank you again for thinking of the Journal of Forestry.
Sincerely,
W. Keith Moser, Dr.For., CF
Editor-in-Chief
SAF Member 30 + years
624 IRISH DR
Fort Collins, CO
80521
United States
RE: JF-10-103 Version 1
CATHARSIS OF AN OLD FORESTER
Dear FRED J. WINKLER,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript titled "CATHARSIS OF AN OLD FORESTER," (see Blog posting blow)
manuscript JF-10-103 Version 1, for review by the Journal of Forestry. Based on the
reviews, I regret to inform you that we will not be able to accept this manuscript for
publication in the journal.
Frankly, I am not sure where you're going with this commentary. Who is the villain? The
corporation? The environmentalists? The public foresters swayed by appeals? All of us?
There is more than enough blame to go around, as far as I can tell, but what is the
lesson here? Saying we acted unsustainably is a fair accusation, but even now the
definition of sustainability is not agreed upon by all segments of our nation, each of
whom expects equal, if not primary, say in how our resources are managed. I can only
imagine the frustration of someone who has spent his life caring for our natural
resources seeing the current state of affairs. A successful commentary in the Journal of
Forestry must do more than vent frustration รข€“ it must clearly articulate the perceived
problem, and outline a suggestion for a solution.
Thank you again for thinking of the Journal of Forestry.
Sincerely,
W. Keith Moser, Dr.For., CF
Editor-in-Chief
Thursday, December 30, 2010
TO COLORADO SENATE DELEGATION
Please take the opportunity to modify the rules of the Senate in regard to the filibuster. It is ridiculous, besides unconstitutional, that all legislation is subject to a super majority vote.
Saturday, December 18, 2010
LETTER TO ATLANTIC MAGAZINE
RE: Brave Thinkers November 2010 Atlantic
Initial financing for Lonnie Johnson’s development of his JTEC concept came from the Government (Air Force Research Laboratory). Who in Ron Paul’s utopia would capitalize a black man whose only claim to fame is a squirt gun? Especially when the MBAs making capitalization decisions could not differentiate between an electron and a proton
Initial financing for Lonnie Johnson’s development of his JTEC concept came from the Government (Air Force Research Laboratory). Who in Ron Paul’s utopia would capitalize a black man whose only claim to fame is a squirt gun? Especially when the MBAs making capitalization decisions could not differentiate between an electron and a proton
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)